network attribute|range
---|---
total nodes|6.0 - 6.0
total edges|15.0 - 15.0
network density|1.0 - 1.0
average degree|5.0 - 5.0
degree heterogeneity|0.0 - 0.0
degree assortativity|nan - nan
average betweenness centrality (unweighted)|0.0 - 0.0
average betweenness centrality (weighted)|0.0 - 0.0
average clustering coefficient (unweighted)|1.0 - 1.0
average clustering coefficient (weighted)|0.485 - 0.783
Newman modularity|0.0 - 0.0
maximum modularity|0.0 - 0.0
relative modularity|0.0 - 0.0
group cohesion|1.0 - 1.0
network diameter|1.0 - 1.0
**Study description**|**value**
Species|*Poecilia reticulata*
Taxonomic class|Actinopterygii
Population type|captive
Geographical location|Louisville, Kentucky
Data collection technique|video
Interaction type|spatial proximity
Definition of interaction|A contact phase between two individuals was one or more consecutive observations in which they were recorded as being within four body length to one another.
Edge weight type|frequency
Total duration of data collection|90min
Time resolution of data collection (within a day)|10 seconds
Time span of data collection (within a day)|90min
Note|Networks represent 10 independed replicates of grourp of 5 guppies that were familiar with each other
**Citation** | Hasenjager, Matthew J., and Lee Alan Dugatkin. "Familiarity <br> affects network structure and information flow in <br> guppy (Poecilia reticulata) shoals." Behavioral Ecology (2016): <br> arw152.